Less is (Not) More

It seems those leading their motive by this trope wish they had some capacity to play in busier and more complicated fashions, but instead of recognizing this and applying themselves accordingly, they instead opt to dissuade others from doing so.
Would it not be better to say when you are trying too hard to be creative that you may find playing less than you think you ought can be more effectivbe? To not over-reach your capacity when in doubt of the musical situation? Or at the very least, "Don't try so hard".

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the simple drum part if it is what comes naturally or as an approach until you understand the musical situation.
All great composers/bands that warrant intrigue with their art feature busy-ness or complicated arrangements as a symptom of their muse and not the other way around. Blindly reducing drum parts to the point of bare bones pulse architecture because you're afraid the academy won't approve - then why on earth are you doing this? You're just going to have to learn to trust yourself if you are going to enjoy this venture in music. I've never seen or heard a drummer who was happy with their playing ever start an argument over less versus more. And neither will you.
Think for yourself. Creative experiences cannot be pre-calculated - you just have to see when you get there. But you can't have valuable experiences or learn to trust your instincts if you are constantly self-monitoring. Learning to face the challenge of each moment without a safety net is what that makes being a musician a special experience.
Ultimately, less is less and more is more - more or less! :-)
Here is another article on this topic by drummer Mat Marucci that I really enjoyed.
Thoughts? Comments? Criticisms?