|
Bohemian Parody
I've been a Queen fan since I was 10 years old. That's 1980. 'The Game' had just came out. A fabulous time in rock music. I have every Queen album/cd. I have a handful of live video dvds. I have all I need.
But apparently that's not enough. Now through exploitation by the whore media, consumer culture and the allowance of Brian May and Roger Taylor to bankroll on FMs legacy, and a consumption culture we have we witness a resurgence Mercury's popularity with a youthful generation that only relates to the intrigue of Mercury's sexuality. But fans they are not. They are relevance-seeking pilot fish who are barely able to recognize their own gender, let alone respect others for their own business. And then this "biopic" movie 'Bohemian Rhapsody' - a flimsy Hollywood and whore media "re-telling" of Queen's history; a platform to shamelessly exploitat of someone's sexual privacy. This is how the industry and whore media works. Hollywood need more money so they contract the whore media to do their thing and just hammer and exploit the whole sexuality thing. "But Brian May and Roger Taylor supported the movie!" And?...and John Deacon, whom these non-Queen fans don't even know exists, did not support the movie. You know - the member of the band who didn't want to particpate in the glossing of FM into a disposable novelty. Brian May rationalizes selling out his deceased bandmate: "..we realised if we didn't get involved, then somebody else would do it and then you wouldn't be able to protect Freddie's kind of legacy. " Ah yeah. And Judas sold out his Savior for a few silver pieces. If he didn't do it somebody else would have. This makes Brian May a whore as well. John Deacon is not. If you think flamboyant fluffer puppy dog Adam Lambert and his whiny, nasally register is a fitting beard for Queen you are not a fan. Meanwhile Mark Martel, an amazing singer who very closely can resemble the STYLE of FM and his specific idiosyncrasies is not even on the radar of May and Taylor. Perhaps Martel's reach for the stars conflicted with May/Taylor's agent asking him to reach for the bar of soap on the floor? Too much conjecture? But it's okay for the whore media to play with that theme, right? Easy ways to determine how fake and shallow these "new" fans are: - Ask them to name the bassist of Queen. They can't. - Ask them to name the album Bohemian Rhapsody first appeared. They can't. - Ask them to name a SINGLE Queen album they own that is not a Best Of. They Can't. They won't. They just know what the whore media tells them. If such people were so bent on "loving" FM then they would know the absolute disdain he had for the whore media who since the 70s have shamelessy sought to exploit his personal life. So if their "love" included respect, their conscience would revolt - of course they'd first need a conscience. Here's a video where Canadian singer/educator Ken Tamplin also discusses the shortcomings of the lassie Lambert. But Tamplin is a classier fella and doesn't use the term "whore media" a whole bunch of times. Thoughts? Comments? Criticisms? |